Evidence Hub

Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Coding: Evaluating Large Language Models for Current Procedural Terminology Accuracy in Hand Surgery

Emily L. Isch, Jamie Lee, D. Self, Abhijeet Sambangi, T. Habarth-Morales, John Vaile, E. Caterson

Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online, 2025

16 citations

Abstract

Purpose The advent of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT has introduced notable advancements in various surgical disciplines. These developments have led to an increased interest in the use of LLMs for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coding in surgery. With CPT coding being a complex and time-consuming process, often exacerbated by the scarcity of professional coders, there is a pressing need for innovative solutions to enhance coding efficiency and accuracy. Methods This observational study evaluated the effectiveness of five publicly available large language models—Perplexity.AI, Bard, BingAI, ChatGPT 3.5, and ChatGPT 4.0—in accurately identifying CPT codes for hand surgery procedures. A consistent query format was employed to test each model, ensuring the inclusion of detailed procedure components where necessary. The responses were classified as correct, partially correct, or incorrect based on their alignment with established CPT coding for the specified procedures. Results In the evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) model performance on simple procedures, Perplexity.AI achieved the highest number of correct outcomes (15), followed by Bard and Bing AI (14 each). ChatGPT 4 and ChatGPT 3.5 yielded 8 and 7 correct outcomes, respectively. For complex procedures, Perplexity.AI and Bard each had three correct outcomes, whereas ChatGPT models had none. Bing AI had the highest number of partially correct outcomes (5). There were significant associations…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free