Evidence Hub

High risk for life-threatening adverse events of fluoroquinolones in young adults: a large German population-based cohort study

Julia Wicherski, Jonas Peltner, C. Becker, K. Schüssel, Gabriela Brückner, Andreas Schlotmann, H. Schröder, Winfried V. Kern et al.

BMC Medicine, 2025

14 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fluoroquinolone antibiotics have a high potential for serious adverse drug reactions, but real-world evidence in European patient cohorts is lacking. Therefore, we aim to examine the association between fluoroquinolone exposure and potentially life-threatening adverse events stratified by age and gender in Germany.

METHODS: We conducted an administrative cohort study using the active comparator new user design with a risk window up to 365 days between January 2013 and December 2019. Population-based longitudinal data from one of the largest German statutory health insurances were used. Episodes of newly dispensed fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, moxifloxacin, norfloxacin, and enoxacin) were compared to other antibiotics (amoxicillin, amoxicillin clavulanic acid, azithromycin, cefuroxime, cephalexin, clindamycin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, and doxycycline). Endpoints were defined by incident diagnoses of aortic aneurysm/dissection, cardiac arrhythmia, hepatotoxicity, and all-cause mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios were estimated from piece-wise exponential additive mixed models with smooth non-linear effects for person-time and age and adjusted for comorbidities, year and quarter at index.

RESULTS: The cohorts comprised 15,139,840; 11,760,159; 11,027,175; and 15,305,757 antibiotic episodes. Patients during fluoroquinolone episodes were older (59 versus 51 years) and more often female (58% versus 54%). We counted 46,502; 446,727;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free