Evidence Hub

Clinical characteristics and mortality risk factors of Streptococcus constellatus infection: A retrospective cohort study of 390 patients

Ji-Bo Sun, Xiang Tong, Sitong Liu, Shijie Zhang, Lian Wang, Dong-Guang Wang, Qing-Qing Jia, Xing He et al.

Journal of Infection and Public Health, 2025

390 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the clinical characteristics and mortality associated with Streptococcus constellatus (S.constellatus) infection. To identify the clinical features and mortality of patients with S. constellatus infection.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed hospitalized patients with confirmed S.constellatus infection at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2016 to April 2024. S. constellatus was identified using sterile body fluid culture or metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Patients were categorized as monomicrobial or polymicrobial infection. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis was performed to compare the 30-day survival rates based on infection type and infection site, while multivariate Cox regression was conducted to identify independent risk factors for 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 390 patients, 301 (77.2 %) were classified as monomicrobial S. constellatus infection. S. constellatus isolates were highly susceptible to penicillin (98.08 %) and levofloxacin (98.90 %).Overall 30- and 90-day mortality were 13.08 % and 15.13 %, higher in polymicrobial than monomicrobial infections (24.72 % vs 8.97 % at 30 days; 29.21 % vs 10.96 % at 90 days). Polymicrobial infection (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 2.426, p = 0.007) and brain abscess (aHR = 16.689, p < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with S. constellatus infection. In the subgroup of monomicrobial infection,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 390 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free