Evidence Hub

Levofloxacin to Prevent Bacterial Infection in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated by Venetoclax and Azacitidine: A Toulouse-Bordeaux DATAML Registry Study

Xavier Brousse, Nicolas Rasandisona, Emilie Bérard, Harmony Leroy, K. Delavigne, N. Mottal, S. Tavitian, T. Leguay et al.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2025

258 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with cancer remains a controversial issue and is not broadly recommended for hematological malignancies. The venetoclax (VEN) and azacitidine (AZA) combination allows for high rates of complete remission in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but enhances the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) compared to AZA alone, making primary antibiotic prophylaxis a relevant question. Patients and Methods Patients with AML who received VEN-AZA were selected from the DATAML registry to investigate the use of levofloxacin (LEVO) prophylaxis, administered at 500 mg/day from day 10 following the first course of VEN-AZA, until neutrophil recovery (>0.5 × 109/L). Results A cohort of 258 patients was identified (median age 69.8 years, interquartile range 20.4–87.4), with 72 having received LEVO and 186 treated with standard of care (SOC). VEN-AZA was used for newly diagnosed AML in 52.7% of cases. FN occurred in 33.3% of LEVO patients versus 37.1% of SOC patients (P = .572). Time from day 10 VEN-AZA to FN was significantly delayed in LEVO patients (12.5 days vs 8 in SOC; P = .037). Pulmonary infections were considerably reduced by LEVO (10.2% vs 1.4%, P = .018) as well as those involving Enterobacterales (9.1% vs 1.4%; P = .029). No early increase in fluoroquinolone resistance was detected (P = .142). Conclusions Levofloxacin as primary prophylaxis in patients with AML treated with VEN-AZA seems to decrease the rate of documented infections…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 258 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free