Evidence Hub

Evaluating the effectiveness of low-dose oral switch therapy for uncomplicated streptococcal or enterococcal bloodstream infection: a retrospective cohort study

T. Miwa, Koh Okamoto, Kaito Fukasawa, Ryo Yamaguchi, Takehito Yamamoto, Takeya Tsutsumi

JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance, 2025

172 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background Although oral switch therapy (OST) is increasingly recognized as a viable option for uncomplicated gram-positive bloodstream infections (GP-BSI), its optimal dosage remains unclear. In Japan, high-dose regimens of key oral antimicrobials, such as amoxicillin (1000 mg thrice daily) or levofloxacin (750 mg once daily), are not approved. This study investigated the effectiveness of low-dose OST for GP-BSI in a population with a low prevalence of obesity. Methods This retrospective, single-centre study involved patients aged ≥18 years with monomicrobial, uncomplicated BSI caused by ampicillin- or amoxicillin-susceptible Streptococcus or Enterococcus species treated between 2010 and 2023. Patients eligible for OST were identified on day 5 of microbiologically active therapy. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and microbiological data were analysed. Using overlap weighting, we compared 90-day all-cause mortality between OST and intravenous therapy (IVT) only groups. Results A total of 172 patients (86 with OST and 86 with IVT only) were included. The median body mass index was 22.5 (interquartile range [IQR], 19.2–24.7), and the median duration of therapy was 14 days (IQR, 12–15 days). Common oral regimens included amoxicillin (n = 34, 39.5%), amoxicillin/clavulanate (n = 24, 27.9%), and levofloxacin (n = 12, 14.0%). No significant difference in 90-day all-cause mortality was observed between OST and IVT groups (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 172 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free