The role of empiric atypical antibiotic coverage in non-severe community-acquired pneumonia
Abstract
A β-lactam plus a macrolide or a respiratory fluoroquinolone alone is recommended as standard empiric antibacterial therapy for non-severe adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) per Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. However, the evidence in support of adding empiric atypical antibacterial therapy, and specifically the addition of a macrolide, is conflicting and should be balanced with additional factors: the necessity of covering atypical organisms, benefits of macrolide-associated immunomodulation, harms associated with antibiotic use, and selection for antibiotic-resistant organisms. In this review, we examine the role of atypical coverage in standard treatment regimens for patients admitted with non-severe CAP and specifically focus on the addition of macrolides to β-lactams. We conclude that a subset of patients should not be given atypical coverage as part of their regimen.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in Important Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Pathogens and Novel Antibiotic Solutions
- Clinical challenges treatingStenotrophomonas maltophiliainfections: an update
- Guidelines on Implementing Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Korea
- Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Clinical Settings: A Review of Resistance Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies
- What’s old is new again: Insights into diabetic foot microbiome
- Multidrug resistant (or antimicrobial-resistant) pathogens - alternatives to new antibiotics?
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.