Evidence Hub

Clinical Outcomes Associated with Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy in Emergency Department–Discharged Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Mohammed Abdulrahman Alrashed, S Alyousef, Bader N. Alamri, Omar M. Yousef, Hisham AlJarallah, Abdulmajeed M. Alshehri, Omar A. Almohammed, Ahmed Mohammed Aljabri

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025

430 participants

Abstract

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and mortality worldwide. The choice between oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) antibiotic administration in the ED varies based on patient presentation and provider preference, yet the impact of this choice on clinical outcomes, including revisit rates and ED length of stay (LOS), remains unclear. This study aimed to compare PO versus IV antibiotic therapy in CAP patients discharged from the ED in terms of baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, and healthcare utilization. Method: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care ED at the Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs in Saudi Arabia. Adult patients diagnosed treated with antibiotic for CAP and discharged from the ED between 2020–2024 were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on antibiotic administration: POIV. The primary results were ED LOS and 30-day revisit rates. Secondary outcomes included time to first antibiotic administration, fluid administration patterns, and baseline risk factors. Data was extracted from the electronic health record and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: A total of 430 patients were included, with 162 (37.7%) receiving PO antibiotics and 268 (62.3%) receiving IV antibiotics. Baseline characteristics showed higher heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature in the IV group, suggesting more…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 430 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free