Evidence Hub

Evaluating outcomes associated with revised fluoroquinolone breakpoints for Enterobacterales urinary tract infections: A retrospective cohort study

Taylor M. Benavides, J. Aden, S. Giancola

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2022

1,022 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: In 2019, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin for Enterobacterales were lowered. This study sought to determine whether there is a correlation between MIC and outcomes in those receiving fluoroquinolones (FQs) for urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by Enterobacterales pathogens.

METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult patients treated with ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin for a UTI caused by an Enterobacterales pathogen. Patients were placed into low MIC (ciprofloxacin: ≤ 0.25 mcg/mL; levofloxacin ≤ 0.5 mcg/mL), intermediate MIC (ciprofloxacin: 0.5-2 mcg/mL; levofloxacin: 1-4 mcg/mL), or high MIC groups (ciprofloxacin: > 2 mcg/mL; levofloxacin: > 4 mcg/mL). The primary outcome was UTI recurrence, defined as hospital admission, emergency department or clinic visit due to UTI, or antibiotic prescription within 28 days of FQ initiation.

RESULTS: A total of 1022 patients were included: 887, 75, and 60 with a low, intermediate, and high MIC, respectively. UTI recurrence within 28 days occurred most frequently in the high MIC group (20.5% vs. 25.3% vs. 60%; P < 0.01). Risk factors for UTI recurrence identified by multivariable analysis were those with a high MIC (high vs. low MIC: OR 5.20, 95% CI 2.99-9.05, P < 0.01; high vs. intermediate MIC: OR 4.72, 95%CI 2.22-10.03, P < 0.01), a complicated UTI (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.35-2.54; P < 0.01), a history of recurrent UTIs (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.29-2.62; P < 0.01), or a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,022 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free