Evidence Hub

Dapoxetine for premature ejaculation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Li J, Yuan H, Bai Y, Pu C, Tang Y, Dong Q, Wei Q, Han P

Clinical therapeutics, 2014

5,934 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dapoxetine is the first oral agent approved for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). However, some countries have not approved its use. The goal of this meta-analysis was to provide more information about the efficacy and safety of dapoxetine in patients with PE.

METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dapoxetine with a placebo in patients with PE. Relevant eligible RCTs were identified through comprehensive searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and PubMed. Efficacy (intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), patient global impression of change, perceived control over ejaculation, and satisfaction with sexual intercourse) and safety (treatment-emergent adverse events and discontinuation rates) were studied by using Review Manager version 5.1.0.

FINDINGS: Six RCTs involving 5934 patients met the inclusion criteria. The main outcome (IELT) in the dapoxetine group was improved significantly compared with IELT in the placebo group (mean difference, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.30 to 1.88]; P < 0.00001). The 60-mg dose of dapoxetine was more beneficial than the 30-mg dose for IELT (mean difference, -0.47 [95 % CI, -0.73 to -0.20]; P = 0.0005). Although the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events in the dapoxetine group was nearly twice that in the placebo group (50.5% vs 27.9%), reports of severe adverse events were rare.

IMPLICATIONS: Data from the meta-analysis revealed that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,934 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free