Evidence Hub

Dapoxetine combined with non-pharmacological approaches for lifelong premature ejaculation. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nieves Martín M, Marín Novoa P, Avendaño-Coy J

The journal of sexual medicine, 2025

656 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent research has highlighted the potential advantages of combining pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches in treating lifelong premature ejaculation (LPE). Individual therapies have demonstrated efficacy but there is a lack of comprehensive analysis comparing combined treatments to pharmacologic monotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the combined effect of dapoxetine with non-pharmacological therapies compared to drug monotherapy in improving ejaculatory latency, functionality, and self-perception of sexual dysfunction in individuals with LPE.

METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Academic Search Ultimate databases from inception to October 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), while secondary outcomes were self-perception improvements, assessed using the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT), the premature ejaculation profile (PEP), and other evaluation instruments.

RESULTS: Eight RCTs (n = 656 participants) were included. Pooled analysis of studies showed a significant effect of dapoxetine combined with non-pharmacological therapies in improving IELT compared to dapoxetine monotherapy (SDM = 1.6; 95%CI, 0.5-2.8; P = .01), PEDT scores (SDM = 0.9; 95%CI, 0.4-1.4; P < .001) and PEP subscales, with moderate certainty of evidence according to the GRADE guidelines. The non-pharmacological therapies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 656 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free