Evidence Hub

High prevalence and risk factors of multiple antibiotic resistance in patients who fail first-line Helicobacter pylori therapy in southern China: a municipality-wide, multicentre, prospective cohort study

Tao Lyu, Ka-Shing Cheung, Li Ni, Jiaqi Guo, Pei Mu, Yin-Peng Li, Qiu Yang, Xiqiu Yu et al.

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2020

1,113 participants · 21 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to study the prevalence of secondary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in southern China and its risk factors, particularly geographical and socio-economic factors.

METHODS

This was a municipality-wide, multicentre, prospective cohort study involving five major hospitals. Patients aged ≥18 years who failed first-line bismuth-based quadruple anti-H. pylori therapy between September 2016 and February 2018 were recruited. Participants underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy from the antrum and body for H. pylori culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing for six antibiotics (clarithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole, amoxicillin, tetracycline and furazolidone). Patients with failure of H. pylori culture were excluded. Participants completed a questionnaire profiling 22 potential risk factors of H. pylori infection and antibiotic resistance, including medical, social, household and birthplace factors.

RESULTS

A total of 1113 patients failed first-line therapy, with successful H. pylori culture in 791 (71.1%) [male = 433 (54.7%); median age = 43 years]. Secondary resistance rates of dual antibiotics (clarithromycin + metronidazole and levofloxacin + metronidazole) and triple antibiotics (clarithromycin + levofloxacin + metronidazole) were 34.0%, 38.7% and 17.8%, respectively. Risk factors for clarithromycin + metronidazole resistance were history of ≥2 courses of H. pylori therapies [adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.71; 95% CI =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,113 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free