Evidence Hub

Current Pharmacological Management of Premature Ejaculation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Castiglione F, Albersen M, Hedlund P, Gratzke C, Salonia A, Giuliano F

European urology, 2016

85 citations

Abstract

CONTEXT: Premature ejaculation (PE) is the most prevalent male sexual dysfunction. In the last few years, several pharmacologic approaches for oral or topical treatment of PE have been studied.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on the outcome of pharmacologic interventions for PE on intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) in comparison to placebo.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search of PubMed and Scopus using the term "premature ejaculation" was performed on 10 April 2015. Full-text articles on prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating pharmacotherapy were included. The main outcome measure was IELT.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Out of 266 unique records, a total of 22 were reviewed. The majority of RCTs were of unclear methodological quality because of limited reporting of methods. Pooled evidence suggests that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), topical anesthetic creams (TAs), tramadol, and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5is) are more effective than placebo at increasing IELT (all p 70%). Only pooled analyses for dapoxetine 30mg and 60mg were characterized by homogeneous data (both I(2)<30%) while showing a modest but statistically significant improvement in IELT compared with placebo (mean difference 1.39min, 95% confidence interval 1.23-1.54min; p<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis revealed that treatment with dapoxetine significantly improves IELT in patients with PE but with modest efficacy. The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free