Evidence Hub

Prospective comparison of tadalafil 5 mg, dapoxetine 30 mg, and the combination of both in the treatment of premature ejaculation

Hasan AM, Abdelkader MS, AbdelRazek Ahmed M, Mohsen Mohammed M, Alsaghier GA

Arab journal of urology, 2024

92 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the efficacy of tadalafil alone, dapoxetine alone, and tadalafil with dapoxetine as a combination therapy for the treatment of premature ejaculation. Patients and Methods Eligible patients attended our andrology clinic with premature ejaculation were randomly allocated into three groups: group A (92 participants) received on-demand tadalafil, 5 mg; group B (91 participants) were given on-demand dapoxetine, 30 mg; and group C (89 participants) received on-demand combination of tadalafil, 5 mg, and dapoxetine, 30 mg. We assessed the changes in the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and the satisfaction scores 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. Results Highly statistically significant improvements were found in the mean IELT and satisfaction scores 1, 2, and 3 months post-treatment in all groups (P = <0.001). Post hoc analysis suggested this improvement was more pronounced in group C (P < 0.001). Conclusion Both tadalafil and dapoxetine are effective in the treatment of patients with premature ejaculation, but the combination of both drugs gives better results.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 92 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free