Evidence Hub

Promising selective alpha-1 blocker silodosin as a new therapeutic strategy for premature ejaculation and analysis of its drug adverse effect: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Fauzan MI, Daryanto B, Budaya TN, Makkaraka MAG, Fakhri M, Rahman IA

Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica, 2024

2 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Premature Ejaculation (PE) occurs in 31% of men aged 18-59 years, leading to disappointment and avoidance of sexual relations. The current guideline of treatment for PE is Dapoxetine, which possesses several adverse effects causing the limitation of its long-term use. Silodosin, an alpha-1 blocker, has been proposed as a new option for treating PE due to its minimal side effects. Therefore, our study aims to assess the efficacy of silodosin in treating PE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was in accordance with Cochrane Handbook guidelines. Comprehensive literature search was conducted in several databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) Involving premature ejaculation patients; (2) Intervention using silodosin; (3) Comparing placebo or other therapies for PE (4) Outcome includes the Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time (IELT) and reported adverse events related to the therapy. Study quality was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias criteria. Statistical analysis in this study was performed using Review Manager 5.4 Results: A total of four studies were included in this meta-analysis. Our study showed that patients who received silodosin had a significantly longer IELT compared to control (MD: 132.54, 95% CI 51.51-213.57, p < 0.001). However, patient treated with silodosin also possessed significantly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free