Evidence Hub

Bioequivalence Analysis of 2 Dapoxetine Hydrochloride Formulations in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers Under Fed and Fasting Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, 2-Sequence, 2-Period, 2-Way Crossover Study

Keyu Yan, Gehang Ju, Qiong Tan, L. Zeng, W. Qiu

Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2021

80 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

This study assessed whether the reference and test formulations of dapoxetine hydrochloride were bioequivalent under fed and fasting conditions postadministration of a single dose as well as evaluated the safety profile of these 2 formulations. This study was a randomized, single-center, 2-period, open-label, 2-way crossover design study with a washout period of 7 days between each period. The study included 80 subjects, 40 under fed and 40 under fasting conditions. During each study period, the subjects were administered a single oral dose of either the reference or the test formulation, followed by collection of plasma samples 70 hours postdose. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) was performed to determine the concentrations of dapoxetine in plasma samples along with the calculation of Cmax , AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf . In addition, adverse events were monitored to determine the safety of these formulations. The geometric mean ratio (90%CI) for the reference and test formulations was 86% to 100%, 89% to 103%, and 89% to 103% under fasting conditions and 92% to 107%, 91% to 100%, and 92% to 101% under fed conditions for Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-inf , respectively. The 90%CIs for the test/reference ratio for AUC and Cmax were within the acceptable limits of bioequivalence, thus demonstrating bioequivalence for these 2 dapoxetine hydrochloride formulations.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 80 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free