Comparative Study of the Clinical Response Between tDCS and Dapoxetine, Define a Very Effective Therapeutic Target, That Improves the LPE in the Medium Long Term
Abstract
Using Brain Mapping and Cognitive ERPs, the investigatos have searched for a Brain Networks involved during Inhibitory Control in Lifelong Premature Ejaculation (LPE) participants. The investigators have designed a clinical trial comparing placebo with tDCS and blacebo group against Dapoxetine, studying the effects on LPE, as well as side effects and their medium and long-term duration.
Conditions: Premature Ejaculation, Sexual Dysfunction.
Primary outcome: Wavelet Changes define Brain Biomarker of LPE; EEG coherence comparing Dapoxetine against tRNS; Adverse events comparing Dapoxetine against tRNS.
Enrollment: 128 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 128 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial
- Nutritional, Physical, Cognitive, and Combination Interventions and Frailty Reversal Among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with COVID-19 severity in patients with haematological malignancies in Italy: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study
- A randomized, controlled trial of oral propranolol in infantile hemangioma
- Clinical phenotypes of delirium during critical illness and severity of subsequent long-term cognitive impairment: a prospective cohort study
- Increased physical activity improves sleep and mood outcomes in inactive people with insomnia: a randomized controlled trial
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.