Evidence Hub

The Combination of Dapoxetine and Behavioral Treatment Provides Better Results than Dapoxetine Alone in the Management of Patients with Lifelong Premature Ejaculation

Luigi Cormio, Paolo Massenio, Roberto La Rocca, Paolo Verze, Vincenzo G. Mirone, Giuseppe Carrieri

The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2015

50 participants · 53 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is not known whether the efficacy of dapoxetine, the only drug approved for the on-demand treatment of premature ejaculation (PE), can be increased by the addition of sexual behavioral treatment (SBTx). AIM: To test the hypothesis that combined dapoxetine and SBTx provide better result than dapoxetine alone in the management of patient with lifelong PE. METHODS: After a 4-week run-in period, 50 patients with lifelong PE entered a 24-week, open-label, prospective study with a 1:1 assignment. Twenty-five patients (group A) received on-demand dapoxetine 30 mg alone, and the remaining 25 patients (group B) combined on-demand dapoxetine 30 mg and SBTx. The CONSORT 2010 statement was adhered to where possible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), the premature ejaculation diagnostic tool (PEDT) score, and the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean age was 34.16 years in group A and 34.44y in group B. From baseline to 4-, 12- and 24-week evaluation, both groups experienced a significant (P < 0.0001) increase in mean IELT and decrease in mean PEDT score, but patients in group A showed a significantly lower increase in mean IELT (85.0; 84.8; 130.7; 160.0 vs. 92.0; 137.9; 232.7; 370.7 seconds, respectively; P < 0.0001) and a significantly lower decrease in mean PEDT score (20.4; 18.16; 15.88; 14.68 vs. 19.56; 16.0; 11.96; 7.92, respectively; P < 0.0001) than those in group B. At 24-week evaluation, no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free