Evidence Hub

Assessing satisfaction in men with premature ejaculation after dapoxetine treatment in real-world practice

Bang‐Ping Jiann, Yuanyuan Huang

International Journal of Clinical Practice, 2015

286 participants · 25 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There are limited data on the treatment satisfaction with dapoxetine in patients with premature ejaculation (PE). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the treatment satisfaction, effectiveness and safety of dapoxetine for PE patients. METHODS: Subjects received dapoxetine (30 mg or 60 mg) alone or in combination with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, if concurrent with erectile dysfunction for more than 4 weeks in clinical practice. Main outcome measures include Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Clinical Global Impression of Satisfaction (CGIS). RESULTS: From March 2014 to January 2015, a total of 286 PE patients received dapoxetine treatment in this study, with 137 (47.9%) patients diagnosed with lifelong PE and 149 (52.1%) patients diagnosed with acquired PE. At the final follow-up visit, the mean intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (an increase of 3.4 min) and mean score of Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (a decrease of -5.0) improved significantly from baseline, and the satisfaction rate and response rate to dapoxetine treatment were 45.0% and 74.6%, respectively. Satisfaction with dapoxetine treatment was highly correlated with treatment response, and might be improved by scheduled follow-up visits and escalation to a higher dose. Subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) reported a lower treatment response than those without DM. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs) occurred in 47.7% of patients, but no serious TEAEs were reported.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 286 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free