Evidence Hub

Exploring lactoferrin as an innovative covalently immobilized chiral selector for the selective separation of pharmaceutical enantiomers using HPLC.

Ibrahim AE, Alamir SG, Al-Thani G, El Deeb S, Al-Harrasi A

Analytica chimica acta, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Molecular chirality has a profound impact on pharmaceutical drugs' efficacy and safety. Thus, chiral recognition plays a vital role in drug development throughout all process stages. LF is a globular glycoprotein composed of approximately 700 amino acids, that's capable of providing multiple interactions through its amino acid residues.

RESULTS

In the proposed research, lactoferrin (LF) was covalently immobilized for the first time using a monolithic epoxy stationary phase via a Schiff's base formation as chiral selector (CS). LF-CS was evaluated for the enantioselective HPLC separation of 18 racemic pharmaceutical drugs. The chromatographic conditions were optimized for optimum enantio-separation. LF-CS proved its potential as a CS enabling the enantioseparation of 10 drug racemates: cetirizine, omeprazole, lansoprazole, dapoxetine, doxazosin, nebivolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, chlorthalidone and ofloxacin. Moreover, in-silico molecular docking studies were conducted to help understand the separation modes. LF as a CS reported hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, π bonding, van der Waals forces, and electrostatic interactions. Finally, the novel LF-CS was applied to determine the enantiomeric purity of marketed single-enantiomer pharmaceutical products, demonstrating its ability to verify their composition and identify impurities.

SIGNIFICANCE

HPLC remains the primary choice for all pharmaceutical research, as it offers higher sensitivity, reliability, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free