Evidence Hub

Synergistic effect of Chaihu-Shugan-San combined with paroxetine tablets in the treatment of acquired premature ejaculation: study protocol for a randomized controlled proof-of-concept trial

Qian S, Wei J, Zhang P, Ma Z, Guo Y, Ren F, Xiong W

Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025

84 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Acquired premature ejaculation (APE) is a common male sexual dysfunction characterized by a clinically significant reduction in intravaginal ejaculatory latency time. In China, its prevalence ranges from 4% to 39%, while globally, approximately 26% of men report premature ejaculation (PE), with APE accounting for 18.8% of cases. The mechanisms of APE remain unclear, with psychological factors (e.g., anxiety, depression) and neurological factors identified as key influences. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as paroxetine, delay ejaculation by elevating synaptic 5-HT levels, but they are associated with side effects and poor compliance. Chaihu-Shugan-San (CHSGS), a classical Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) formula for depression and anxiety, is commonly used in TCM andrology for APE. It is hypothesized that CHSGS alleviates APE symptoms by improving emotional states through central nervous system modulation.

Methods and analysis: This is a randomized, blinded interventional trial with four parallel groups. A total of 84 eligible participants will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: the paroxetine group, CHSGS group, CHSGS + paroxetine group, or placebo group. The primary outcomes are Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and Pre- and post-treatment brain fMRI scans. The Secondary Outcomes include Premature ejaculation profile (PEP), Chinese Index of Premature Ejaculation (CIPE) and TCM syndrome score.

Ethics and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 84 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free