Evidence Hub

Twelve-Month Visual and Anatomical Outcomes of Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis in Four Patients with Multiple Graft Failures and Severe Ocular Pathology

Hamed Ghasemi, Pirouzeh Farsi, Amirsadra Zangouei, Hassan Hashemi

Journal of Current Ophthalmology, 2025

Abstract

Purpose: To assess 12-month visual acuity, anatomic integrity, and complication rates after Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis (BKPro-I) implantation in eyes with multiple failed penetrating keratoplasties and complex anterior segment pathology. Methods: In this prospective case series, four eyes (mean age, 32 ± 9 years) received BKPro-I between January and June 2022. All surgeries employed polymethylmethacrylate front plates, customized titanium back plates, and a standardized perioperative regimen (IV cefazolin, topical vancomycin + levofloxacin, corticosteroid taper, nightly povidone-iodine, selective antifungal prophylaxis) with early 16 mm scleral lens fitting. Follow-up occurred at 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, monthly to 3 months, then quarterly to 12 months postoperatively. Primary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), device retention, and sight-threatening complications. Results: At 12 months, all devices were retained. Functional success (BCVA ≥20/200) was achieved in 100% of eyes in 6 months; at 12 months, 75% reached ≥20/100 and 50% ≥20/60 (mean gain ≥5 ETDRS lines). Two eyes (50%) developed complications – retroprosthetic membranes, vitritis/suspected endophthalmitis, stromal melting, chronic hypotony, and silicone-oil leak – all managed without device loss; one eye’s vision declined to finger counting at month 7 but remained ambulatory. Conclusions: BKPro-I yields excellent short-term visual rehabilitation and perfect retention in highly complex eyes.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free