Evidence Hub

Pharmacological interventions for premature ejaculation: a mixed-treatment comparison network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Sridharan K, Sivaramakrishnan G, Sequeira RP, Al-Khaja KA

International journal of impotence research, 2018

25 citations

Abstract

Premature ejaculation (PE) is the most common sexual dysfunction in men. The present study is a network meta-analysis of drugs used for treating PE. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing medical interventions with either placebo or with other active drugs in patients with PE. Consistency between the direct and indirect estimates were checked. Publication bias was assessed. Inverse variance heterogeneity model was used for mixed treatment comparisons. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and adverse events were the main outcome measures. Odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals was the effect estimate. Grading of the evidence was carried out based on precision, consistency, directness, risk of bias and publication bias of the included studies. Results: A total of 48 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Dapoxetine 30 (1.2, 1-1.4) and 60 mg (1.7, 1.3-2.7), sildenafil (2.6, 1.3-3.9), paroxetine with sildenafil (3, 1.9-4.1), topical lidocaine (3.4, 2-4.7), vardenafil (3.5, 2-5), pindolol with paroxetine (4, 2.8-5.2), tramadol (4.5, 3.3-5.7), topical lidocaine with tadalafil (5.1, 4-6.2) and topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (6.4, 2.4-10.5) were associated with significant increase in IELT. Similarly, dapoxetine 60 mg, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, tramadol at 25, 50 and 100 mg and combined fluoxetine and tadalafil were associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Dapoxetine 30 mg has a high likelihood…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free