Evidence Hub

Safety and efficacy characteristics of oral drugs in patients with premature ejaculation: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Qin Z, Wang Y, Zhu J, Zhu K, Li R, Zhang L, Meng X, Xia J et al.

International journal of impotence research, 2019

18 citations

Abstract

Although previous studies have investigated the safety and efficacy characteristics of oral drugs in patients with premature ejaculation (PE), the available results remained inconsistent. Hence, this article was conducted to comprehensively compare the effectiveness of oral drugs and several relevant complications in patients with PE. Relevant researches were comprehensively searching from the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, up to May 1st, 2018. The pooled standard mean difference (SMD) or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% Credible interval (CrI) was respectively utilized to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral drugs in PE. A total of 25 relevant research were ultimately included in this network meta-analysis. PE oral drugs mainly included serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i). Our results successfully shed light on the efficacy differences of oral drugs for the treatment of PE. The cumulative rank probability of IELT at 4-6 weeks from best to worst was SSRIs + PDE5i, PDE5i, and other SSRIs alone. In addition, this meta-analysis also showed fluoxetine 20 mg, dapoxetine 60 mg, PDE5i, and SSRIs + PDE5i had a higher, whereas other SSRIs alone had a relatively lower incidence rate of clinically relevant complications. In summary, our results showed that the usage of PDE5i only or in combination with SSRIs might be stronger than SSRIs alone in the efficacy of PE oral drugs. Nevertheless, it also has a problem about the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free