Evidence Hub

Oral agents for the treatment of premature ejaculation: review of efficacy and safety in the context of the recent International Society for Sexual Medicine criteria for lifelong premature ejaculation

McMahon CG, Porst H

The journal of sexual medicine, 2011

42 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: New diagnostic criteria for lifelong premature ejaculation (PE) have been proposed by the International Society of Sexual Medicine (ISSM), including an intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) of less than about 1 minute, lack of control over ejaculation, and PE-related distress or bother.

AIM: The aim of this study was to review evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of oral agents for the treatment of PE in the context of the new ISSM criteria.

METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of oral agents in PE that included stopwatch measurements of IELT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure used for this study was a review of the efficacy and safety data of oral agents for PE aligned with ISSM criteria.

RESULTS: Since the latest meta-analyses using similar criteria (conducted in 2004 and 2005 for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] and phosphodiesterase type 5 [PDE-5] inhibitors, respectively), eight studies evaluated SSRIs vs. placebo, one compared SSRIs, two evaluated PDE-5 inhibitors, and one evaluated an SSRI/PDE-5 inhibitor combination. New agents included dapoxetine (five studies) and tramadol (one study). Six studies enrolled men who met an approximation of the ISSM criteria. Although evidence suggests that most SSRIs, tramadol, and dapoxetine increase IELT to varying degrees, few studies included control over ejaculation and PE-related distress or bother as…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free