Evidence Hub

Emerging prevalence of microsporidial keratitis in Singapore: epidemiology, clinical features, and management

Raymond S. K. Loh, Cordelia M. L. Chan, S. Ti, L. Lim, Kian S. Chan, D. Tan

Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2009

124 participants · 110 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence and epidemiologic factors involved in the development of microsporidial keratitis. The association of host immune status and clinical pattern, clinical features, and the role of fluoroquinolone monotherapy in treatment are also examined.

DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative case series.

PARTICIPANTS: All cases (124 patients, 134 eyes) of microsporidial keratitis confirmed with modified trichrome stain positive of corneal scrape over a 4-year period.

METHODS: Epidemiologic factors were observed. Host immune status with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serology and CD4/CD8 analysis was performed when consent was obtained. Visual acuity (VA) and slit-lamp examination throughout the course of keratitis was recorded. Treatment used included topical fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin 0.3%, moxifloxacin 0.5%, gatifloxacin 0.5%, levofloxacin 0.5%, or norfloxacin 0.3%) as monotherapy or in combination with topical fumagillin and/or systemic albendazole. Where corneal edema developed, ultrasound corneal pachymetry was recorded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic features and epidemiologic factors, including host immune status. Clinical features and disease course, including the response to different therapeutic regimes.

RESULTS: Patients ranged in age from 11 to 68 years (mean, 31.9; median, 30) with a male:female ratio of 8:1 (females n = 17 [13.7%]). We performed HIV serology and CD4/CD8 in 45.9% of cases (n = 57); all the cases tested were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 124 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free