Evidence Hub

Effects of intermittent senolytic therapy on bone metabolism in postmenopausal women: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial

J. Farr, Elizabeth J. Atkinson, Sara J. Achenbach, Tammie L. Volkman, Amanda J. Tweed, Stephanie J. Vos, Ming M. Ruan, J. Sfeir et al.

Nature Medicine, 2024

60 participants · 105 citations

Abstract

Preclinical evidence demonstrates that senescent cells accumulate with aging and that senolytics delay multiple age-related morbidities, including bone loss. Thus, we conducted a phase 2 randomized controlled trial of intermittent administration of the senolytic combination dasatinib plus quercetin (D + Q) in postmenopausal women (n = 60 participants). The primary endpoint, percentage changes at 20 weeks in the bone resorption marker C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTx), did not differ between groups (median (interquartile range), D + Q −4.1% (−13.2, 2.6), control −7.7% (−20.1, 14.3); P = 0.611). The secondary endpoint, percentage changes in the bone formation marker procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), increased significantly (relative to control) in the D + Q group at both 2 weeks (+16%, P = 0.020) and 4 weeks (+16%, P = 0.024), but was not different from control at 20 weeks (−9%, P = 0.149). No serious adverse events were observed. In exploratory analyses, the skeletal response to D + Q was driven principally by women with a high senescent cell burden (highest tertile for T cell p16 (also known as CDKN2A) mRNA levels) in which D + Q concomitantly increased P1NP (+34%, P = 0.035) and reduced CTx (−11%, P = 0.049) at 2 weeks, and increased radius bone mineral density (+2.7%, P = 0.004) at 20 weeks. Thus, intermittent D + Q treatment did not reduce bone resorption in the overall group of postmenopausal women. However, our exploratory analyses indicate…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free