Evidence Hub

Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

Hong Xu, Raymond S. Y. Tang, T. Lam, Gui-jun Zhao, James Y. W. Lau, Yunpeng Liu, Qi Wu, L. Rong et al.

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2022

173 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy improves polyp detection and characterization in colonoscopy. However, data from large scale multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCT) in an asymptomatic population are lacking.

METHODS

This multicenter RCT aimed to compare AI-assisted colonoscopy (AI) to conventional colonoscopy (CC) for adenoma detection in an asymptomatic population. Asymptomatic subjects aged 45 to 75 years undergoing colorectal cancer screening by direct colonoscopy or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) were recruited in 6 referral centers in Hong Kong, Jilin, Inner Mongolia, Xiamen and Beijing. In the AI group, an AI polyp detection system (Eagle-Eye, Xiamen InnoVision) with real time notification on the same monitor of the endoscopy system was used. Primary outcome was overall adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes were mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), ADR according to endoscopist's experience, and colonoscopy withdrawal time. This study received IRB approval (CRE-2019.393).

RESULTS

From November 2019 to August 2021, 3059 subjects were randomized to AI (1519) and CC (1540). Baseline characteristics and bowel preparation quality between the two groups were similar. The overall ADR (39.9% vs 32.4%, p<0.001), Advanced ADR (6.6% vs 4.9%, P=0.041), ADR of expert (42.3% vs 32.8%, p<0.001) and non-expert endoscopists (37.5% vs 32.1%, p=0.023) and APC (0.59+/-0.97 vs 0.45+/-0.81, p<0.001) were all significantly higher in AI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free