Evidence Hub

Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy in Myopia Control in Children: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Yu Jiang, Zhuo-Ting Zhu, Xingping Tan, X. Kong, Hui Zhong, Jian Zhang, R. Xiong, Yi-Xiong Yuan et al.

Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.), 2021

264 participants · 243 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in myopia control in children.

DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, single-blind clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 264 eligible children aged 8 to 13 years with myopia of cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of -1.00 to -5.00D, astigmatism 0.0 logMAR (Snellen 1.0 or 20/20) were enrolled in July to August 2019. Follow-up was completed in September 2020.

METHODS

Children were randomly assigned to the intervention group [RLRL treatment plus single vision spectacle (SVS)] and control group (SVS). The RLRL treatment was provided by a desktop light therapy device which emits red light of 650 nm in wavelength, at an illuminance level of approximately 1600 lux and a power of 0.29 mW for a 4-mm pupil (Class I Classification), and was administered at home under supervision of parents, 3 minutes per session, twice per day with a minimum interval of 4-hours, five days per week.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome and a key secondary outcome were changes in axial length (AL) and SER measured at baseline, and 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. Participants who had at least one post-randomization follow-up visit were analyzed for treatment efficacy based on a longitudinal mixed model.

RESULTS

Among 264 randomized participants, 246 (93.2%) children were included in the analysis (n = 117 in the RLRL and n = 129 in the SVS group). Adjusted 12-month axial…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 264 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free