Evidence Hub

Green versus blue: Randomized controlled trial comparing indocyanine green with methylene blue for sentinel lymph node detection in endometrial cancer

A. Rozenholc, V. Samouélian, T. Warkus, P. Gauthier, D. Provencher, P. Sauthier, France Gauthier, P. Drakopoulos et al.

Gynecologic Oncology, 2019

132 participants · 74 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the increase in detection rate of sentinel lymph node (SLN) associated with the use of indocyanine green (ICG) in comparison with methylene blue dye in women with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

For this randomized controlled trial, all patients underwent SLN mapping after injection of blue dye on one side of the cervix and ICG on the other side. Randomization was for the side (right vs. left) on which ICG was used so that each patient's contralateral hemipelvis (HP) served as a control to her ipsilateral HP. We performed a two-tailed, normal-approximate McNemar test for paired-matched data. The primary endpoint was the difference in SLN detection rate for each HP according to the dye used.

RESULTS

This trial included 132 patients, and 46 patients underwent robotic-assisted surgery while 86 had standard laparoscopic surgery. Successful detection of SLN was 90.9% using ICG and 64.4% using blue dye (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in the duration of the SLN procedure (median 10 min per HP) and number of SLN per HP (mean 1.2) according to the dye used. The SLN detection rates for either dye were very similar whether the surgical approach was robotic (mean BMI 45) or laparoscopic (mean BMI 29). Crossover of dye to the contralateral HP was present in 3% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The use of ICG instead of blue dye results in a 26.5% (95% CI 17.4%-35.6%) increase of SLN detection rates per HP in women with endometrial cancer.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 132 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free