Evidence Hub

Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication for metachronous gastric cancer prevention: a randomized controlled trial

J. Choi, S. G. Kim, Jeongmin Choi, J. Park, Sooyeon Oh, Hyo-Joon Yang, Joo Hyun Lim, J. Im et al.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2018

898 participants · 92 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Whether eradication of Helicobacter pylori reduces the incidence of metachronous gastric cancer (MGC) is still debatable. We aimed to evaluate the long-term effect of H pylori eradication on the development of MGC after endoscopic gastric tumor resection.

METHODS

We undertook an open-label, prospective, randomized controlled trial at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea. Participants were recruited during April 2005 to February 2011 and followed until December 2016. We assigned 898 patients with H pylori infection treated with endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric dysplasia or early gastric cancer to receive (n =442) or not receive (n =456) eradication therapy using a random-number chart. Eradication group patients received oral omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for a week, whereas control group patients received no H pylori treatment. The primary outcome was the incidence of MGC (intention-to-treat analysis).

RESULTS

The 877 patients who attended ≥1 follow-up examination (eradication group, 437; control group, 440) were analyzed. Median follow-up was 71.6 months (interquartile range, 42.1-90.0). MGC developed in 18 (4.1%) eradication and 36 (8.2%) control group patients (log-rank test, P = .01). In our yearly analysis, the effect of eradication showed a significant difference in 5 years after allocation (log-rank test, P = .02). The adjusted hazard ratio for the control group was 2.02 (95% CI, 1.14-3.56; P = .02),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 898 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free