Evidence Hub

Comparison of Treatment of Emergent Adverse Events in Men with Premature Ejaculation Treated with Dapoxetine and Alternate Oral Treatments: Results From a Large Multinational Observational Trial

P. Verze, T. Cai, C. Magno, F. Sabella, V. Cucchiara, A. Palmieri, V. Mirone

Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2016

7,545 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dapoxetine (DPX) has a pharmacokinetic profile suggesting a low rate of class-related adverse events (AEs).

AIM: To assess the incidence of treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs) of special interest (known associations with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and/or potential clinically relevant AEs), and the related discontinuation rate in patients with premature ejaculation (PE) treated with DPX or alternate oral treatment (AOT), in routine clinical practice.

METHODS: In a prospective, 12-week, open-label, postmarketing observational, multinational study (PAUSE), 7545 patients were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: DPX 30-60 mg and AOT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence rate of predefined TEAEs of special interest (mood and related, neurocognitive related, cardiovascular, urogenital and sexual function, accidental injury, and abnormal bleeding) in the DPX and the AOT groups, and the rate of AEs leading to study discontinuation.

RESULTS: The safety analysis was performed on 6128 patients treated with DPX and 1417 with AOT. The incidence of TEAEs of special interest in each AE category was greater for patients treated with AOT than with DPX. The higher differences were observed in the neurocognitive-related category (DPX 1.9% vs. AOT 4.7%; P < .001), in the mood and related category (DPX 0.4% vs. AOT 1.1%; P < .001), and in the urogenital system/sexual function (DPX 0.4% vs. AOT 0.8%; P = .04). Cardiovascular TEAEs were the only AEs numerically greater in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 7,545 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free