Evidence Hub

Sex differences in outcomes and response to spironolactone in HFpEF: a secondary analysis of TOPCAT

M. Merrill, N. Sweitzer, J. Lindenfeld, David P. Kao

JACC. Heart failure, 2019

177 citations

Abstract

Objective: Describe sex differences in outcomes and response to spironolactone in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Background: HFpEF affects women more frequently than men. Sex differences in effect of mineralocorticoid antagonists have not been reported. Methods: This was an exploratory, post-hoc, non-prespecified analysis of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT). Subjects with symptomatic HF and an LVEF ≥45% were randomized to spironolactone or placebo. Subjects enrolled from the Americas were analyzed. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular (CV) death, cardiac arrest, or HF hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included all-cause, CV, and non-CV mortality, and CV, HF, and non-CV hospitalization. Sex differences in outcomes and treatment effect were determined using time-to-event analysis. Results: In total, 882/1767 (49.9%) subjects were women. Women were older with fewer comorbidities but worse patient-reported outcomes. There were no sex differences in outcomes in the placebo arm or in response to spironolactone for the primary outcome or its components. Spironolactone was associated with reduced all-cause mortality in women (HR 0.66, p=0.01), but not in men (pinteraction=0.02). Conclusions: In TOPCAT, women and men presented with different clinical profiles and similar clinical outcomes. The interaction between spironolactone and sex in TOPCAT overall and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free