Evidence Hub

An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Helicobacter pylori Antibiotic Resistance in Iran (2010-2020)

Khademi F, Sahebkar A

Microbial drug resistance (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2020

24 citations

Abstract

This updated systematic review and meta-analysis followed two objectives: (1) to determine Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance in Iran during 2010-2020 and (2) to assess the trend of resistance from 1997 to 2020. A systematic search in multiple databases, including ISI Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Scientific Information Database (SID), was performed using MeSH-extracted keywords. Meta-analysis was done on extracted data from a total of 27 included citations published between 2010 and January 20, 2020. The overall mean prevalence of H. pylori resistance was 64.9% for metronidazole, 25.3% for clarithromycin, 20.7% for amoxicillin, 16.1% for tetracycline, 21.9% for levofloxacin, 22.8% for rifampicin, 27.2% for furazolidone, 32.3% for ciprofloxacin, and 38.7% for erythromycin. In addition, the prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains of H. pylori was 26.5% in Iran. The pooled prevalence of point mutations A2143G, A2142G, and A2142C associated with clarithromycin resistance were 46.6%, 37.2%, and 5.5%, respectively; mutations in frxA and rdxA genes associated with metronidazole resistance were 46.4% and 19.7%, respectively; gyrA and gyrB genes mutations among fluoroquinolone-resistant strains were 55.3% and 48.2%, respectively; and resistance associated with integrons was 47%. According to the present findings, resistance of H. pylori to antibiotics used for eradication therapy has reached an alarming level in Iran. Furthermore, the trend of H.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free