Which is first? The controversial issue of precedence in the treatment of male sexual dysfunctions
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In male sexual dysfunction (MSD), the presence of sexual comorbidities is relatively frequent. However, what is still a matter of controversy is what the first-line therapy in these patients should be. METHODS: Three scientists and the editor of the Controversies section, all experts in the medical treatment of MSD, present different perspectives on the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5), testosterone and dapoxetine in erectile dysfunction (ED), hypogonadism, and premature ejaculation (PE). The psychological aspects are discussed by an outstanding expert in psychosexology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Expert opinion supported by the critical review of the currently available literature. RESULTS: Testosterone should be used before PDE5s in hypogonadal men with comorbid ED; PDE5s should be used before dapoxetine in PE patients with comorbid ED, and counseling should be offered to all subjects with MSD. CONCLUSIONS: Although the answer to the question "which should be first?" is controversial in almost all MSDs, intuition, experience, and evidence should guide the choice of which treatment should be used first. This decision is highly critical in influencing the therapeutic outcome as well the patient's and couple's adherence to treatment.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Nutritional, Physical, Cognitive, and Combination Interventions and Frailty Reversal Among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with COVID-19 severity in patients with haematological malignancies in Italy: a retrospective, multicentre, cohort study
- A randomized, controlled trial of oral propranolol in infantile hemangioma
- Clinical phenotypes of delirium during critical illness and severity of subsequent long-term cognitive impairment: a prospective cohort study
- Increased physical activity improves sleep and mood outcomes in inactive people with insomnia: a randomized controlled trial
- COVID-19-associated hyperinflammation and escalation of patient care: a retrospective longitudinal cohort study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.