Evidence Hub

A Novel Polyherbal Formulation Modulates Cyclophosphamide-Induced Cytotoxicity in TM3 Leydig Cells and Delays Fictive Ejaculation in Spinal Cord Transected Male Rats

Patrick Brice Defo Deeh, Hye-Yong Kim, Kiseok Han, Anbazhagan Sathiyaseelan, Hyun‐Jong Cho, Myeong‐Hyeon Wang

Pharmaceuticals, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Background: Cyclophosphamide (CP) chemotherapy is commonly associated with various side effects. The development of an effective therapy capable of counteracting these effects is of great interest. Objectives: We evaluated the effects of a novel polyherbal formulation (PHF) on CP cytotoxicity in TM3 cells and fictive ejaculation in rats, and determined its possible mechanism. Methods: The phytochemical analysis of PHF was determined by GC-MS. Various oxidative stress-related parameters (DPPH, ABTS+, CUPRAC, FRAP, MMP, and DCF-DA) and the cytotoxicity (hemolysis and HET-CAM) of PHF were evaluated. Its effect on fictive ejaculation was tested by recording the electromyographic activities of bulbospongiosus muscles, and the involvement of TRPV1/TRPM2 channels was investigated using their specific agonists and antagonists. Results: We found that PHF contained various phytocompounds. PHF prevented CP-induced oxidative stress in TM3 cells, probably due to its strong antioxidant potential. For instance, PHF inhibited apoptosis, lipid peroxidation, and ROS generation. Furthermore, the activities of capsaicin (CAP) and cumene hydroperoxide (CHPx) were significantly lowered by PHF, indicating TRPV1 and TRPM2 inhibition. In the in vivo study conducted in spinal male rats, the number of contractions of the bulbospongiosus muscles was significantly (p < 0.001) lowered in the PHF + DOPA (1.54 ± 0.3) and PHF + CAP (2.43 ± 0.74) groups, compared with the DOPA (8.75 ± 0.71) and CAP (7.41 ±…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free