Evidence Hub

Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes) isolates, a systematic review and meta-analysis

Beig M, Shirazi O, Ebrahimi E, Banadkouki AZ, Golab N, Sholeh M

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2024

41 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the overall antibiotic susceptibility of Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes), a bacterium implicated in acne vulgaris, with a particular focus on clindamycin and fluoroquinolones, which are commonly used in inflammatory acne treatment.

METHODS: A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and EMBASE databases was conducted to identify relevant studies. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, and additional analyses included quality assessment, evaluation of publication bias, meta-regression and subgroup analyses based on antimicrobial susceptibility methods and year of publication.

RESULTS: The analysis incorporated a total of 39 studies. The random-effects model revealed that the proportion of clindamycin-resistant isolates was 0.031 (95% CI: 0.014-0.071). Additionally, macrolides, including erythromycin (0.366; 95% CI: 0.302-0.434) and azithromycin (0.149; 95% CI: 0.061-0.322), exhibited distinct prevalence rates. Tetracyclines, including doxycycline (0.079; 95% CI: 0.014-0.071), tetracycline (0.062; 95% CI: 0.036-0.107) and minocycline (0.025; 95% CI: 0.012-0.051), displayed varying prevalence estimates. Fluoroquinolones, including ciprofloxacin (0.050; 95% CI: 0.017-0.140) and levofloxacin (0.061; 95% CI: 0.015-0.217), demonstrated unique prevalence rates. Additionally, the prevalence of the combination antibiotic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT) was estimated to be 0.087 (95% CI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free