Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of Silodosin versus Tadalafil as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Lower Ureteric Calculi: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Aquinas Benedict, R. V. Kumar, Jeyapal Parthiban

NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2026

90 participants

Abstract

Background: Medical expulsive therapy (MET) helps patients with lower ureteric calculi (LUC) pass their stones more easily. Although tadalafil and silodosin are promising MET agents, it is yet unknown how effective they are in comparison. The treatment efficacy of these medicines in LUC patients was compared in the current investigation. Methods: 90 patients were divided into two groups at random and given tadalafil (Group B) and silodosin (Group A) as prospective treatments. Every patient's age, sex, stone type, size, ejection rate, and pain episodes were noted and examined. Results: Groups A and B had mean ages of 39.1 (± 8.0) and 37.4 (± 8.2) years, respectively. With mean BMI values (kg/m2) of 27.1 (± 1.7) and 27.5 (± 1.6) for Groups A and B, respectively, the groups' sex distribution and comorbidities were comparable. Additionally, the mean stone type (radiopaque: 75.6% vs. 80.0%) and size (7.6 mm vs. 7.8 mm) were comparable. Silodosin treatment, however, resulted in a lower use of analgesics (198.8 mg vs. 247.8 mg, p < 0.001), fewer pain episodes (1.1 vs. 2.5, p < 0.001), and a greater expulsion rate (80.0% vs. 60.0%) and shorter expulsion duration (14.4 vs. 17.7 days, p < 0.001). With the exception of frequent irregular ejaculation with silodosin (17.8% vs. 4.4%), the side effects were comparable. Conclusion: In conclusion, even though silodosin is linked to an increased risk of irregular ejaculation, it is superior to tadalafil in encouraging stone removal while…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 90 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free