Evidence Hub

A Controlled Trial for Preventing Priapism in Sickle Cell Anemia: Hydroxyurea plus Placebo vs Hydroxyurea plus Tadalafil

I. Idris, A. Yusuf, Ismail Isah Ismail, A. Borodo, M. Hikima, S. Kana, Tukur Aliyu, Kabiru Musan Gedu et al.

Blood, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

Abstract: Recurrent ischemic priapism is a common complication of sickle cell anemia (SCA) and is associated with devastating physical and psychosocial consequences. All previous trials for priapism prevention have failed to demonstrate clear efficacy. We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 2 feasibility trial comparing fixed moderate-dose hydroxyurea plus placebo (usual-care arm) with fixed moderate-dose hydroxyurea plus tadalafil (experimental arm) in 64 males (aged 18-40 years) with at least 3 episodes of SCA-related priapism in the past 12 months. Priapism data were obtained via daily text messages to the participants. The trial's primary outcome measures were 100% recruitment, 98.4% retention, and 93.5% adherence rates. Over a median of 10 months (interquartile range, 3-12), 2.5 and 3.02 priapism events per participant-month were recorded in the usual-care and the experimental arms, with an incidence rate ratio of 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.9; P = .654). The rates of serious adverse events (P = .999) and hospitalization (P = .289) were similar in the 2 arms. Sperm concentration, motility, and normal morphology significantly decreased on hydroxyurea therapy but recovered to prehydroxyurea levels 3 months after therapy cessation. Post hoc, single-arm, pre-post analysis showed a 58.3% priapism incidence rate reduction in the usual-care arm (5.9-2.5 events per month; difference, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.1-5.8; P = .005) and a 66.3% priapism reduction…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free