Evidence Hub

Acute hemodynamic effects of TPN171H in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a randomized, controlled, phase 2a trial

Yu-Ping Zhou, Lu-Hong Qiu, Wei Ma, Yu Cao, Jiang-Hong Li, Wei Huang, Lan Wang, Dao-Wen Wang et al.

Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 2026

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has a poor prognosis despite available treatments. TPN171H, structurally modified from traditional Chinese medicine (Epimedium), was reported to have a high affinity for phosphodiesterase type 5 and exhibited anti-inflammatory and vasodilatory effects in preclinical studies. This phase 2a randomized trial (NCT04483115) evaluated the hemodynamic effects and safety of TPN171H in PAH. Sixty patients with PAH were randomly assigned to receive placebo, TPN171H (2.5, 5, or 10 mg) or tadalafil (20 or 40 mg) and evaluated for hemodynamic changes for 24 h. The primary endpoint was the maximum change (%) in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from baseline. The key secondary endpoint was the change (%) in PVR to systemic vascular resistance (SVR) ratio at each observation point from baseline. Compared to the placebo group, the least square mean differences in the maximum change in PVR were −16.8% (95% CI, −29.1 to −4.5, p = 0.008) in TPN171H 5 mg, −15.4% (95% CI, −28.2 to −2.7, p = 0.019) in tadalafil 20 mg, and −13.3% (95% CI, −25.6 to −0.9, p = 0.036) in the tadalafil 40 mg group. Moreover, TPN171H 5 mg, but none of the tadalafil doses, showed a significant reduction in PVR/SVR ratio at 2 h (p = 0.026), 3 h (p = 0.030), and 5 h (p = 0.046) compared to the placebo group. No serious adverse events occurred. TPN171H 5 mg demonstrated favorable acute hemodynamic effects and an acceptable short-term safety profile in this exploratory trial,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free