Evidence Hub

Impact of fatigue as the primary determinant of functional limitations among patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome: a cross-sectional observational study

Sarah Walker, H. Goodfellow, Patra Pookarnjanamorakot, E. Murray, Julia Bindman, A. Blandford, K. Bradbury, Belinda Cooper et al.

BMJ Open, 2023

3,754 participants · 120 citations

Abstract

Objectives To describe self-reported characteristics and symptoms of treatment-seeking patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS). To assess the impact of symptoms on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patients’ ability to work and undertake activities of daily living. Design Cross-sectional single-arm service evaluation of real-time user data. Setting 31 post-COVID-19 clinics in the UK. Participants 3754 adults diagnosed with PCS in primary or secondary care deemed suitable for rehabilitation. Intervention Patients using the Living With Covid Recovery digital health intervention registered between 30 November 2020 and 23 March 2022. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome was the baseline Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS). WSAS measures the functional limitations of the patient; scores of ≥20 indicate moderately severe limitations. Other symptoms explored included fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire–Eight Item Depression Scale), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale, Seven-Item), breathlessness (Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale and Dyspnoea-12), cognitive impairment (Perceived Deficits Questionnaire, Five-Item Version) and HRQoL (EQ-5D). Symptoms and demographic characteristics associated with more severe functional limitations were identified using logistic regression analysis. Results 3541 (94%) patients were of working age (18-65); mean age (SD) 48 (12)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 3,754 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free