Evidence Hub

Deep principal dimension encoding for the classification of early neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus with volumetric laser endomicroscopy

J. A. van der Putten, M. Struyvenberg, J. de Groof, T. Scheeve, W. Curvers, E. Schoon, J. Bergman, P. D. De with et al.

Comput. Medical Imaging Graph., 2020

14 citations

Abstract

Barrett cancer is a treatable disease when detected at an early stage. However, current screening protocols are often not effective at finding the disease early. Volumetric Laser Endomicroscopy (VLE) is a promising new imaging tool for finding dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE) at an early stage, by acquiring cross-sectional images of the microscopic structure of BE up to 3-mm deep. However, interpretation of VLE scans is difficult for medical doctors due to both the size and subtlety of the gray-scale data. Therefore, algorithms that can accurately find cancerous regions are very valuable for the interpretation of VLE data. In this study, we propose a fully-automatic multi-step Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) algorithm that optimally leverages the effectiveness of deep learning strategies by encoding the principal dimension in VLE data. Additionally, we show that combining the encoded dimensions with conventional machine learning techniques further improves results while maintaining interpretability. Furthermore, we train and validate our algorithm on a new histopathologically validated set of in-vivo VLE snapshots. Additionally, an independent test set is used to assess the performance of the model. Finally, we compare the performance of our algorithm against previous state-of-the-art systems. With the encoded principal dimension, we obtain an Area Under the Curve (AUC) and F1 score of 0.93 and 87.4% on the test set respectively. We show this is a significant improvement…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free