Evidence Hub

A network meta-analysis on comparative efficacy and tolerability of on-demand therapy for premature ejaculation

Niwanda Yogiswara, Yusuf Azmi, Yufi Aulia Azmi

Bali Medical Journal, 2020

5,950 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: The use of pharmacotherapy as a first-line treatment for premature ejaculation (PE) is recommended by EAU guidelines. However, no study had analyzed multiple treatment comparisons among available on-demand therapy. Therefore, we aimed to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to characterize the comparative efficacy and tolerability of on-demand therapy for PE.Methods: We systematically searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in several databases at any period up to November 2019. NMA was performed to estimate efficacy and tolerability outcomes using intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) and overall adverse effects (AEs), respectively. We ranked each outcome using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and presented the two outcomes as a clustered ranking plot.Results: A total of 19 RCTs comprising 5950 patients were included in this NMA. All active treatments showed significant improvement compared to placebo. Among the available on-demand treatment, the combination of SSRI plus PDE5i showed the highest efficacy (MD: 3.06; 95%CI 1.84-4.29) followed by tramadol 100 mg and vardenafil 10 mg (MD 2.9, 95%CI 1.63-4.16; MD 2.36, 95%CI 1.2-3.52; respectively). Based on the SUCRA, the combination of SSRI plus PDE5i had the highest score (91.7%) in efficacy, while dapoxetine 30 mg had the highest score (73.3%) in terms of tolerability.Conclusion: The combination of SSRI plus PDE5i was the treatment of choice for individuals who prioritize…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,950 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free