Evidence Hub

Clinical impact of levofloxacin inhalation solution in cystic fibrosis patients in a real-world setting

C. Schwarz, C. Grehn, S. Temming, F. Holz, P. Eschenhagen

Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 2021

86 participants · 13 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Levofloxacin inhalation solution is the most recently approved inhaled antibiotic in Europe and Canada for adult cystic fibrosis patients. Its efficacy and safety have been assessed in randomized controlled trials. Our aim was to evaluate real life experience and outcomes in our treatment centre.

METHODS

We evaluated the efficacy of inhaled levofloxacin solution in 86 patients with cystic fibrosis in terms of the following outcome parameters: changes in %-predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), body-mass index (BMI), and exacerbation rate. We conducted an intraindividual analysis of patients who received levofloxacin inhalation solution twice daily 240 mg for at least 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Change in FEV1% predicted for the treatment period was +2.27% (p=0.0027) after 4 weeks. There was no change in BMI for overall group, but exacerbation rate compared to one year before initiation of inhaled levofloxacin decreased significantly (p=0.0024) after 1 year of treatment (3.23 ± 1.39 versus 2.71 ± 1.58).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cystic fibrosis, inhaled levofloxacin solution has the potential to improve FEV1 and to reduce the number of bronchopulmonary exacerbations.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 86 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free