Evidence Hub

Comparing efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy with tadalafil, tamsulosin, and silodosin for distal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis

S. Ebrahimpour, Mona Kargar, Mohadeseh Balvardi, O. Tabatabaei-Malazy, Pardis Asadi, Mehdi Mohammadi

Asian Journal of Urology, 2024

15 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is a suitable option for facilitating stone expulsion in patients with distal ureteral stones. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy with tamsulosin, silodosin, and tadalafil on stone expulsion rate (SER) and stone expulsion time (SET), as well as their comparative safety, numbers of colic pain episodes, and need for analgesics.

METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were retrieved by searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to November 27, 2023. Hand-searching was also conducted in Google Scholar to find additional records. Papers in English that compared the safety and efficacy of at least two of the above agents in adults with distal ureteral stones ≤10 mm were included.

RESULTS: In total, 27 studies were identified (six studies through database searches and 21 through checking reference lists and hand-searching in Google Scholar). More than half of them (n=15, 56%) were conducted in India. The SER significantly improved with silodosin compared with tamsulosin (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, p<0.001), whereas the difference in SET was non-significant. Tadalafil achieved a significantly higher SER compared with tamsulosin (OR 1.42, p=0.042) without any difference in SET. Subgroup analysis of 5- and 10-mg doses of tadalafil showed no significant difference in SER or SET. We found no significant difference in need for analgesics (mean difference [MD -53.73, p=0.2) or the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free