Evidence Hub

Evaluating the effects of tadalafil on lower urinary tract symptoms DUE to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rifki Adhi Nofrian, Ricky Adriansjah

Indonesian Journal of Urology, 2026

645 participants

Abstract

Objective: This review aims to assess tadalafil's efficacy and safety in managing BPH-LUTS, providing insights for clinical practice. Material & Methods: A systematic search strategy was conducted across several electronic reference databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Proquest, and Cochrane) and included articles published between 2014-2024. Duplicate publications, review articles, and incomplete articles were excluded. Results: Database search yielded 302 articles, which were systematically eliminated, leaving 10 relevant articles. A total of 1.645 patients were involved in the 10 included studies. Of the 10 included studies, 9 were single-center studies and 1 was a multi-center study. Of all the studies, 7 were randomized controlled trials, 2 were observational trials, and 1 was a cohort study. From the meta-analysis test, it was found that the increase in IPSS 12 weeks after therapy was no different when administering tadalafil and tamsulosin. Conclusion: In conclusion, tadalafil monotherapy demonstrates comparable efficacy to tamsulosin in treating LUTS/BPH, with its approval stemming from its effectiveness in managing ED. The IPSS score between tadalafil and tamsulosin is considered similar statistically. Studies suggest synergistic effects when combined with alpha-blockers, offering promise for patients with concurrent conditions. Safety findings support its utility across diverse populations.

Keywords: BPH, LUTS, tadalafil.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 645 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free