Evidence Hub

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors combined with traditional Chinese medicine for diabetes mellitus-induced erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lei Xiang, Ai-Qun Liu, Wenyi Tang, Bin Sun, Yang Yang, Yilin Li, Siyu Chen, Ju-Yun Zhao et al.

Medicine, 2025

1,070 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus-induced erectile dysfunction (DMED) involves complex pathophysiology, leading to suboptimal outcomes with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5I) alone. Combining PDE5I with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may enhance therapeutic efficacy, but evidence synthesis is lacking. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PDE5I combined with TCM versus PDE5I monotherapy in DMED management. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42021240608). Six databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang, and VIP Science Technology Periodical Database) were searched up to May 10, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PDE5I + TCM versus PDE5I alone in DMED patients with International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) ≤ 21 were included. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment (Cochrane tool), and meta-analysis (RevMan 5.3) were performed using fixed/random-effects models. Outcomes included clinical efficacy, IIEF-5 scores, TCM syndrome scores, and adverse events. Results: Twelve RCTs (1070 participants) were included. PDE5I + TCM significantly improved clinical efficacy (relative risk = 2.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] [2.13, 3.84], P .05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that PDE5I combined…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,070 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free