Evidence Hub

(366) efficacy of nutraceuticals in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a network meta-analysis

D. Tienforti, F. Di Giulio, Luca Spagnolo, Francesco D'Alessandro, Federica Antolini, S. Palazzi, Chiara Castellini, A. Barbonetti

Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2024

Abstract

We evaluated the effects of different nutraceutical formulations widely available worldwide as alternative treatment strategies in improving erectile function in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach.

A search of PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, and Cochrane Library was performed, limited to studies using IIEF-score, published through September 2023. To facilitate the efficacy rating for individual nutraceutical treatments, we excluded studies in which more than three different molecules were used in combination in the same group. We performed direct pairwise meta-analyses and then a frequentist random-effects NMA to incorporate estimates from direct and indirect comparisons. The surface area under the cumulative classification curve (SUCRA) expresses the percentage of effectiveness of each treatment relative to an “ideal” treatment, using values range from 0 to 100%.

The included 16 RCTs investigated 13 nutraceutical preparations. At the NMA forest plot (Figure 1), when compared with placebo, significant improvements in IIEF score were induced by L-arginine, acetil L-carnitine (ALC) + propionil L-carnitine (PLC), L-arginine + Tadalafil, ALC + PLC + Sildenafil. Among the different nutraceutics, the association between ALC, PLC and sildenafil was associated to the highest SUCRA (0.96), followed by the association between L-arginine and Tadalafil (0.84), ALC + PLC (0.79) and L-arginine (0.55).

In the context of the widespread ineffectiveness of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free