Evidence Hub

Levofloxacin Versus Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin Combination in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients

M. Izadi, B. Dadsetan, Z. Najafi, S. Jafari, E. Mazaheri, Omid Dadras, Hajar Heidari, SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi et al.

Recent Patents on Anti-Infective Drug Discovery, 2019

150 participants · 24 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Asia, an estimated one million deaths are caused by communityacquired pneumonia (CAP) each year. Despite the high mortality in elderly people, a large number of CAP patients have been treated and survived with optimal life expectancy. A few studies have been done on adult CAP therapeutic approaches in Asia. Moreover, differences have been noted between these studies and European data. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of oral Levofloxacin (TAVANEX), 750 mg, once daily for five days versus parenteral Ceftriaxone 1gr BD, plus oral Azithromycin (250 mg, once daily) for seven to ten days (standard regimen) in CAP treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized trial among 150 patients with CAP in Qaem Hospital of Alborz city from December 2016 to June 2017. A group of CAP patients were randomized in two treatment groups. One group was treated with oral Levofloxacin (TAVANEX), 750 mg, once daily for five days and the other group with parenteral Ceftriaxone 1gr BD plus oral Azithromycin (250 mg, once daily) for seven to ten days (standard regimen). The efficacy and side effects of the assigned drugs were compared between two groups. The probability level for statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

The body temperature (P value=0.09), WBC count (P value=0.15), respiratory sounds (P value=0.18) and admission duration (P value=0.15) showed no significant differences after treatment between two groups. There was no report of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 150 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free