Evidence Hub

The effects of oral treatment for systemic sclerosis related pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Y. Lei, Xiao Zhang, Hao-Bo Lin, Yuan Feng, Jie-Ying Wang, Ri-qiang Luo

Modern Rheumatology, 2019

15 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The usage of oral therapies, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), phosphodiesterase type-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors and prostaglandin analogs has resulted in improved outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension related to systemic sclerosis (SSc-PAH). However, the optimal therapeutics have not been determined. Methods A systematic searching in the databases of Medline (PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Library (Central) and unpublished clinical trials (clinicaltrials.gov) was conducted to identify the clinical studies with oral treatment for SSc-PAH patients published before 1 June 2019. The data were extracted and the quality was assessed. The main outcomes are exercise capacity and hemodynamic parameters, which were synthesized and analyzed. Results In total, 27 clinical trials were enrolled for further analysis. It was demonstrated that bosentan treatment, the widely used drug for PAH, might improve the exercise capacity and pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in this clinical setting, although without significant difference. Meanwhile, the usage of prostaglandin analogs could improve the parameters mentioned above. Furthermore, combined therapy with ambrisentan and tadalafil significantly increased the treatment efficacy of key parameters in SSc-PAH patients compared with basic treatment. Conclusion This meta-analysis reveals that combination therapy might provide more benefits to exercise capacity and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free