Evidence Hub

Macitentan Plus Tadalafil Single‐Tablet Combination Therapy in Chinese Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Subgroup Analysis of the A DUE Study

F. Fan, Lu Sun, Zhenwen Yang, Lan Wang, Qi-Guang Wang, Jiang Li, Hong Gu, Wei-Ping Xie et al.

Pulmonary Circulation, 2025

187 participants

Abstract

ABSTRACT Macitentan 10 mg and tadalafil 40 mg single‐tablet combination therapy (M/T STCT) has been evaluated in the global A DUE study (NCT03904693). Here, we report the results of a subgroup analysis in participants from China. This double‐blind, active‐controlled, Phase 3 A DUE study randomized patients with symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) to receive M/T STCT, macitentan, or tadalafil depending on their baseline PAH treatment (treatment‐naïve, endothelin receptor antagonist, or phosphodiesterase Type 5 inhibitor monotherapy). The primary end point was change in pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) expressed as the ratio of geometric means (GMR) of Week 16 to baseline. A total of 187 patients were randomized, including 23 patients in China. PVR reduction was significantly greater with M/T STCT compared with macitentan (50%) and tadalafil (41%) (adjusted GMRs were 0.50; 95% confidence level [CL]: 0.35–0.72; p = 0.0017 and 0.59; 95% CL: 0.43–0.80; p = 0.0040, respectively) in Chinese patients. M/T STCT was well tolerated in Chinese patients; the safety profile was consistent with that of macitentan and tadalafil monotherapies, and that of the overall population. In conclusion, in Chinese patients with PAH, PVR was reduced with M/T STCT versus either monotherapy after 16 weeks of treatment; the safety profile of M/T STCT was in line with the known safety profile of the individual components and appeared consistent with the overall population, although data…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 187 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free